'DISGRACEFUL' KFA IS QUALIFIED TO RUN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS? ...WE NEED TO COMMISSION THE CENTRAL ELECTION COMMISSION LIKE THE SPORTS ASSOCIATION ELECTION

'Disgraceful' KFA Is Qualified to Run Presidential Elections? ...We need to commission the Central Election Commission like the sports association election

'Disgraceful' KFA Is Qualified to Run Presidential Elections? ...We need to commission the Central Election Commission like the sports association election

Blog Article

The Korea Football Association has been certified as an organization that cannot hold a single presidential election properly.

Although it has tarnished Korean soccer due to a series of administrative difficulties, this incident is truly the end of the incompetence of the KFA leadership.

As a result, the opinion that the Korea Football Association should withdraw from the presidential election and entrust it to a neutral organization is gaining convincing power. The court, which is nowhere else, has been described as "significantly infringing on fairness," nailing that the Korea Football Association is an organization that cannot run the election.

A shocking thing happened in Korean soccer history.

A day before the 55th presidential election of the Korea Football Association, the court accepted candidate Huh Jung-moo's request for provisional injunction due to unfair and unreasonable procedures.

As a result, the chairman's election schedule, which was scheduled to be held on the 8th, has been postponed without reservation.

On the 7th, the Seoul Central District Court's Civil Agreement Department 50 (Chief Judge Lim Hae-jeong) decided to cite Huh's application for an injunction against the Korea Football Association's presidential election ban.

The election for the president of the Football Association was put on hold a day earlier.

Earlier on the 30th of last month, candidate Huh applied for a provisional injunction against the presidential election to the Seoul Central District Court.

The reason for the request was that the election management was unreasonably conducted, citing the fact that the composition of the election management committee was unclear and the schedule and procedures were not properly announced, that professional soccer leaders and athletes participating in winter training were virtually excluded from the election due to offline in-person voting without online methods, and that 21 fewer electors were formed than the regulation (194 people) due to "non-submission of consent to provide personal information."

Initially, the court's citation was scheduled to come out on the 6th, but it was delayed by a day, and there were many observations that it was difficult to cite.

However, the court ruled in favor of candidate Huh.

The court judged that "there is a significant procedural violation that will be acknowledged to have significantly violated the fairness of the election and thereby affected the election process."

In addition, he pointed out that the majority of the electors were formed through a lottery process where transparency and fairness were not confirmed.

In addition, the court added that it was not possible to confirm whether the committee was organized in accordance with the articles of association and election management regulations because it did not disclose who was appointed as a member of the election management and operation committee. The non-disclosure of the members was strongly raised not only by candidate Heo but also by candidate Shin Moon-seon, who ran for election together.

The court also predicted that with three candidates running as candidates, the number of 21 votes excluded from the electorate is likely to affect the decision of candidates to go to the runoff if there is no majority vote in the first round, which will likely trigger a subsequent dispute over the effectiveness of the election.

The court judged that the need for preservation to accept the application for provisional injunction was also clarified when considering it comprehensively.

Whenever candidate Huh or candidate Shin raised a problem, the Korea Football Association refuted it clearly and protested that there was no problem with the election. 먹튀검증

However, the court, no other agency, confirmed that the KFA election was unfair and had many flaws.

Report this page